Featured Post
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
What is the meaning of custodial death?
Custodial death refers to the death of a person in custody or under the control of law enforcement authorities, such as the police, prison officials, or other government agencies. It occurs while the person is detained, arrested, interrogated, or held in custody for investigation or legal proceedings.
Custodial deaths can occur under various circumstances, including but not limited to:
- Excessive use of force: When the person in custody is subjected to excessive or unwarranted force by law enforcement officials, resulting in their death. This could involve physical abuse, torture, or other forms of mistreatment.
- Negligence or lack of proper care: Inadequate medical attention, neglect, or failure to provide necessary healthcare can contribute to custodial deaths. If a person's health deteriorates while in custody, and the authorities fail to provide appropriate medical assistance, it may lead to their death.
- Suicide or self-inflicted harm: In some cases, individuals in custody may take their own lives or intentionally harm themselves, leading to death. Mental health issues, despair, or mistreatment can contribute to such incidents.
- Unexplained circumstances: There may be instances where the cause of death in custody remains unclear or disputed. These cases often require thorough investigation to determine the death's cause and circumstances.
Custodial deaths raise significant concerns regarding human rights, the proper treatment of individuals in custody, and the accountability of law enforcement agencies. They highlight the need for transparency, impartial investigation, and accountability mechanisms to prevent and address such incidents.
Supreme Court Guidelines on Custodial Death:
One important case law that established guidelines to prevent custodial deaths in India is the D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal case (1997). In this landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India recognized the need to safeguard the fundamental rights of individuals in custody and laid down specific guidelines to prevent custodial violence and ensure the well-being of detainees. Some of the critical guidelines established in this case include:
- Arrest memo: The police personnel carrying out the arrest must prepare a memo that includes the date, time, and place of arrest. It should also be attested by at least one witness, a family member, a respectable person from the locality, or a recognized non-governmental organization (NGO) representative.
- Informing a family member or friend: The person being arrested has the right to notify a family member or friend about the arrest and the place of detention.
- Memo of custody: A memo of custody must be prepared by the police at the place of detention, mentioning the details of the person arrested, the time of arrest, the name and particulars of the police personnel in whose custody the person is being detained, and the name and address of the family member or friend who has been informed about the arrest.
- Medical examination: The person arrested must be subjected to a medical examination by a qualified doctor within 48 hours of arrest. A doctor should examine the government service, and should be recorded in a memo. The detainee has the right to be examined by a doctor.
- Custodial deaths and injuries: A mandatory judicial inquiry must be conducted in case of custodial deaths or allegations of custodial violence resulting in injuries. A judicial magistrate or a district judge should carry out the inquiry.
These guidelines aim to safeguard the rights and well-being of individuals in custody, promote transparency, and prevent custodial deaths and violence. They emphasize the importance of following due process, documentation, and accountability by law enforcement agencies.
Another landmark judgment related to custodial deaths in India is the Supreme Court's judgment in the case of People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) v. State of Maharashtra (2014). The judgment addressed the issue of custodial deaths and highlighted the need for police reforms and accountability.
In this case, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the guidelines in the D.K. Basu case and emphasized the importance of preventing custodial violence and deaths. The court reiterated that custodial deaths are a gross violation of human rights and a matter of grave concern. It further emphasized the obligation of the state to protect the life and dignity of individuals in custody.
People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) v. State of Maharashtra (2014) Judgment highlights:
- Registration of FIR: The court emphasized the mandatory registration of First Information Reports (FIRs) in custodial deaths or deaths caused by police encounters. It stated that an independent investigation by the State Crime Branch or a Special Investigation Team (SIT) is required.
- Autopsy and medical examination: The court stressed the importance of conducting a proper post-mortem examination in custodial deaths. It highlighted the need for an independent and impartial medical examination, ensuring that the autopsy is carried out by a medical officer other than the one connected with the police.
- Compensation to the victim's family: The court emphasized the right of the victim's family to receive compensation for custodial deaths. It stated that the state should provide compensation and awards in cases of custodial deaths due to police action or inaction.
- Departmental inquiries and disciplinary action: The court highlighted the importance of departmental inquiries against police personnel involved in custodial deaths. It emphasized that disciplinary action should be taken against the erring officers and that the process should be prompt and impartial.
The PUCL v. State of Maharashtra judgment reaffirmed the significance of preventing custodial deaths, protecting human rights, and ensuring accountability. It is an essential reference point for addressing custodial deaths and establishing safeguards to prevent such incidents in India.
It's important to note that custodial deaths are generally considered tragic and unacceptable. Legal frameworks and international human rights standards emphasize protecting an individual's rights and dignity while in custody, and custodial deaths violate those principles. Efforts are made by authorities, human rights organizations, and legal bodies to prevent and address custodial deaths through improved training, oversight, accountability, and legal reforms.
Vakilkaro is a Best Legal Services Providers Company, which provides Civil, Criminal & Corporate Laws Services and Registration Services like Private Limited Company Registration, LLP Registration, Nidhi Company Registration, Microfinance Company Registration, Section 8 Company Registration, NBFC Registration, Trademark Registration, 80G & 12A Registration, Niti Aayog Registration, FSSAI Registration, and other related Legal Services.
Contact India's best Legal Firm, Vakilkaro, today. You can give us a call at +919828123489 or may write an Email also at help@vakilkaro.co.in. We are here to serve you 24/7.
"Happy Customer serves the company success"- we aim to achieve this through our legal services."
Why should you trust Vakilkaro?
- 100% guaranteed satisfaction
- Largest Network across India
- Easy to Hire
- Provides legal service in easy language.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment